Gao Fei: Announcement on the Progress of the “Defend the Bottom Line of Life” Joint Signature Campaign as of April 15, 2026
As of April 15, 2026, the “Defend the Bottom Line of Life” joint signature campaign has received a cumulative total of 1,077 signatures, with 978 people included in the statistics (duplicate signatures and entries with incomplete names or phone numbers were removed during the review). Thank you to all fellow citizens for your support, solidarity and vigilance along the way.
As of now, regarding the initiative letter, letter urging a reply and second letter urging a reply that have been submitted successively, the five national bodies—the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the State Council, the National Health Commission, the Ministry of Public Security and the National Commission of Supervision—still have not provided any positive response.
By “no positive response” here, I do not mean that we have received no words at all, but rather that: to this day, not a single department has directly answered the core questions I have continued to raise; not a single department has directly responded to the social fear and public concerns triggered by this major life crisis; and not a single department has directly assumed the state responsibility it should bear.
Even the only contact and feedback concerning the second letter urging a reply submitted on March 29 consisted merely of asking me to raise the matter again with the “government organs and units with the authority to handle it.” This approach is not a response to the problem, but a continuation of shifting the problem; it is not an assumption of responsibility, but a continuation of severing responsibility; it is not facing the issue of life, but a continuation of evading the issue of life.
When a citizen has, through peaceful, public, rational and sustained means, repeatedly sent letters, urged replies, provided explanations, organized joint signatures and made public appeals to the relevant departments at the highest levels of the state, while the five national bodies have still collectively failed to provide any positive response to this day, this is no longer merely delay in the general sense, nor an ordinary procedural hold-up, but an overall failure to perform their duties regarding a major issue of life, a systematic sidelining of citizens’ legitimate appeals, and a serious dereliction of the state’s responsibility to protect life.
A question directly concerning life safety, life ethics, institutional responsibility and society’s basic sense of security has been treated by the five national bodies for a prolonged period through silence, referral, disavowal and evasion. This alone is sufficient to show that, on this major issue, state organs have still not adopted an earnest attitude commensurate with the seriousness of the problem, nor demonstrated the due recognition of and reverence for the lives, fears and concerns of the people.
But precisely for this reason, we must remain silent no longer.
Rights have never automatically arrived in silence, and justice will not naturally be realized through retreat. If a society wishes to hold the bottom line of life, it cannot rely only on a small number of people bearing the pressure alone; it also needs the civic consciousness of more and more ordinary people to return, and needs more people to understand that when state organs fail to provide a positive response to a major public issue for a prolonged period, citizens’ continuing to speak out, continue to ask questions, continue to sign jointly and continue to demand a reply is not meddling or overstepping, but fulfilling a citizen’s most basic responsibility.
The only way forward is to continue calling out: Please, more people, stand up. Do not regard this matter as unrelated to you. Do not hand the issue of life over to silence. Do not let the rights that should be pursued be exhausted in waiting.
Only when more people are willing to speak out, more people are willing to sign jointly, and more people are willing to truly shoulder their civic responsibilities will it become more difficult for state organs to evade the matter indefinitely; will society have a greater possibility of approaching a positive response; and will more basic rights and justice have a possibility of truly being reclaimed.
As of now, the five national bodies still have provided no positive response. This is not the end. It precisely shows that we must retreat even less.
Defending the bottom line of life must continue.
Please continue to join the joint signature campaign.
Please continue to persist in speaking out.
If you support our “Defend the Bottom Line of Life” initiative, you are welcome to sign in support. Please ensure that the information is as complete as possible when signing; filling in the address to the county level is sufficient (click the “Defend the Bottom Line of Life” QR-code image to enter the signature page).
Initiator of the “Defend the Bottom Line of Life” initiative: Gao Fei 19878794300(same number on WeChat)
Related Reporting
Aug 29, 2026
Li Qiaochu: Update on Xu Zhiyong’s Situation in Prison (August 29, 2026)
The writer received a letter from Xu Zhiyong dated August 21, 2026, saying his outdoor time had improved to 10 a.m. daily for 30 minutes. Correspondence had also become smoother than during the previous two months. The writer considers the matter closed for now but plans to continue asking about Xu’s basic living conditions. Xu reportedly liked hand-drawn pictures sent with a letter in late July.
Aug 29, 2026
Chow Hang-tung: Statement of Plea
The author rejects a 206-page judgment that, they argue, treats belief in ending one-party dictatorship as unconstitutional and criminal. They say law cannot control thoughts, condemn obedience to authoritarian power, and describe ending one-party dictatorship as a responsibility of Hong Kong and Chinese people. The author refuses to apologize for these beliefs, accepts possible imprisonment, and vows to continue pursuing democracy, accountability for the 1989 massacre and a democratic Hong Kong and China.
Aug 29, 2026
Kunming Shijixincheng Christian Church Case to Hold Pretrial Conference on September 2, 2026, Trial to Begin on September 16
The Kunming Shijixincheng Christian Church case will hold a pretrial conference on September 2, 2026, with trial scheduled to begin September 16. Authorities raided a church gathering on April 12, taking preacher Yu Shaolin, Li Qun and Luo Ping into custody. The three were formally arrested on May 20 on suspicion of “organizing an illegal gathering” and are held at Guandu District Detention Center.
Aug 28, 2026
Zion Church’s Open Prayer Letter Urging the Beihai Yinhai District Court to Immediately Release Wang Zhong and Wu Qiuyu
Zion Church said the Beihai Yinhai District Procuratorate indicted its “10·9” case on July 17, 2026, but a planned August pretrial conference and trial were postponed after lawyers protested. Eight pastors and co-workers remain detained on fraud and/or illegal business operations charges. The church said Wang Zhong’s bail requests were denied despite severe heart disease and his father’s death, while Wu Qiuyu remains separated from her two young children.
