Agents in the Duan Hua case Wen Donghai and Wang Ligan forcibly summoned by officers from the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau
On July 24, 2026, this outlet learned that Wen Donghai and Wang Ligan, agents in the Duan Hua case, were forcibly summoned by officers from the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau.
On the afternoon of July 22, 2026, prominent legal professionals Wen Donghai and Wang Liqian, acting as entrusted representatives for the family of the “Duan Hua case” in filing complaints, went to the Guilin Municipal Commission of Supervision in Guangxi to legally submit complaint materials concerning suspected disciplinary and legal violations by Huang Wenqing, president of the Lingui District Court, and Nie Huayu, vice president.
According to information previously disclosed by Wen Donghai, on-site staff of the Commission of Supervision refused to accept the materials and were unwilling to process them on the grounds that the matter involved litigation-related legal issues. The two sides engaged in nearly three hours of negotiations and communication on site. During the negotiations, the two sides had a verbal altercation, after which staff of the Commission of Supervision called the police. Subsequently, the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau dispatched several officers, including Su Zihua, to the scene and forcibly summoned Wen Donghai and Wang Liqian to the Lingui Police Station, claiming that they intended to impose public-security penalties on the two. The two were later released.
Wen Donghai issued the following account of the matter: Today, Wang Ligan and I submitted complaint materials to the Guilin Municipal Commission of Supervision, but a member of the Commission’s staff (apparently named Wang Zefu) said that this involved litigation-related legal issues and would not accept or process the materials. He also firmly refused to tell us his name. In order not to accept the materials, he deliberately misread the statutory provision, omitting the words “transfer,” and Wang Ligan asked him to show us the Supervision Law, but he refused to do so. However, according to the Supervision Law and the Regulations on Letters and Visits, even if the matter is not under their jurisdiction, they should first accept the materials and then transfer them to the authority with the power to handle them. Moreover, as Huang Wenqing and Nie Huayu are the president and vice president of the court, their multiple illegal acts are certainly also suspected of disciplinary violations and must fall within the jurisdiction of the Commission for Discipline Inspection.
We argued with him all afternoon, for nearly three hours, but he simply refused to accept the materials. In our anger, I said that with this work style, he would be better off going to eat shit. Wang Ligan said, “If you are a human being, then read Article 30 of the Supervision Law. If you do not dare to read it, then you are an animal.” He reported that we had insulted him, and Su Zihua and several other officers from the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau forcibly summoned us to the police station, saying that they would impose public-security penalties on us.
They can wantonly frame lawyer Duan Hua and can turn a blind eye to laws written in black and white, but when it comes to our demands, not a single gesture can be wrong.
Related Reporting
Aug 29, 2026
Li Qiaochu: Update on Xu Zhiyong’s Situation in Prison (August 29, 2026)
The writer received a letter from Xu Zhiyong dated August 21, 2026, saying his outdoor time had improved to 10 a.m. daily for 30 minutes. Correspondence had also become smoother than during the previous two months. The writer considers the matter closed for now but plans to continue asking about Xu’s basic living conditions. Xu reportedly liked hand-drawn pictures sent with a letter in late July.
Aug 29, 2026
Chow Hang-tung: Statement of Plea
The author rejects a 206-page judgment that, they argue, treats belief in ending one-party dictatorship as unconstitutional and criminal. They say law cannot control thoughts, condemn obedience to authoritarian power, and describe ending one-party dictatorship as a responsibility of Hong Kong and Chinese people. The author refuses to apologize for these beliefs, accepts possible imprisonment, and vows to continue pursuing democracy, accountability for the 1989 massacre and a democratic Hong Kong and China.
Aug 29, 2026
Kunming Shijixincheng Christian Church Case to Hold Pretrial Conference on September 2, 2026, Trial to Begin on September 16
The Kunming Shijixincheng Christian Church case will hold a pretrial conference on September 2, 2026, with trial scheduled to begin September 16. Authorities raided a church gathering on April 12, taking preacher Yu Shaolin, Li Qun and Luo Ping into custody. The three were formally arrested on May 20 on suspicion of “organizing an illegal gathering” and are held at Guandu District Detention Center.
Aug 28, 2026
Zion Church’s Open Prayer Letter Urging the Beihai Yinhai District Court to Immediately Release Wang Zhong and Wu Qiuyu
Zion Church said the Beihai Yinhai District Procuratorate indicted its “10·9” case on July 17, 2026, but a planned August pretrial conference and trial were postponed after lawyers protested. Eight pastors and co-workers remain detained on fraud and/or illegal business operations charges. The church said Wang Zhong’s bail requests were denied despite severe heart disease and his father’s death, while Wu Qiuyu remains separated from her two young children.




