Shi Xiuju: Complaint Materials Concerning Suspected Serious Violations of the Party’s Six Disciplines in the Handling by the Shaanxi Provincial Public Security Department, the Weiyang Branch of the Xi’an Public Security Bureau, and the Daming Palace Police Station of the Case in Which Shi Xiuju Was Maliciously Poisoned

Complainant: Shi Xiuju, female, 63 years old

ID number: 610102196301122040

Address: Building 6, Xitie Community, Huaqing East Road, Xincheng District, Xi’an

Telephone: 15289381281

Complained-against units and personnel

1. Weiyang Branch of the Xi’an Public Security Bureau

Person complained against: Secretary Wang of the Discipline Inspection Commission, police ID number: 019530

2. Daming Palace Police Station of the Weiyang Branch of the Xi’an Public Security Bureau

Persons complained against: Wu Songrang (political instructor, police ID number: 018598), Zhao Ren (former police officer, police ID number: 021058)

3. Shaanxi Provincial Public Security Department

Person complained against: Wang Yiran, police ID number: 000153, suspected of procedural violations, bending the law for personal ends, and handling cases based on personal favors and relationships

Requests of the complaint

1. Pursuant to law, investigate and hold the personnel involved from Daming Palace Police Station, the Weiyang Public Security Branch, and the Shaanxi Provincial Public Security Department accountable under Party discipline, for government misconduct, and under the law for procedural violations in handling the case, dereliction of duty, and bending the law for personal ends;

2. Revoke the unlawful Notice of Conclusion issued by the Shaanxi Provincial Public Security Department and order a new, comprehensive review of this case in accordance with the law;

3. Designate an out-of-area case-handling unit to accept and examine all key evidence submitted by me, including blood and urine toxicology reports, and restart the case investigation procedures;

4. All case-handling personnel of the Weiyang Branch of the Xi’an Public Security Bureau and Daming Palace Police Station shall recuse themselves from this case in accordance with the law.

Facts and reasons

I was maliciously poisoned by Ma Lu, a doctor at Xi’an Zhongnuo Dental Hospital. Medical examinations confirmed heavy-metal poisoning, which also caused gastric erosion, renal tubular damage, and nephrotic syndrome. For many years, I have continuously reported the case and submitted a complete set of medical testing materials to defend my rights. From the grassroots police station to the provincial public security department, this case has produced a complete chain of unlawful case handling. Personnel at every level violated regulations, and their handling of the case seriously violated laws and regulations as well as the Party’s Six Disciplines. The specific facts are set out below:

I. Daming Palace Police Station of the Weiyang Branch of the Xi’an Public Security Bureau: inaction at the source of the case and serious violations of case-handling procedures

1. After receiving the report on September 8, 2020, police officer Zhao Ren refused to handle it in accordance with the law

I reported that I had been poisoned and harmed. Zhao Ren did not go to the scene, did not prepare an interrogation record, and did not issue a Receipt of Case Acceptance. No statutory case-handling documents were issued, and the case was not formally registered, making it an irregular “black case.”

Violations of statutory provisions: Article 61 of the Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Administrative Cases by Public Security Organs and Article 169 of the Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs.

Disciplinary violations: violation of public-contact discipline by evading the demands of members of the public who reported harm; violation of work discipline through inaction in performing duties and disregard for statutory case-handling procedures.

2. Delaying for more than two years the issuance of a document declining to place the case on file, depriving me of my right to timely relief

I reported the case in September 2020, but it was not until November 14, 2022, that a Notice of Non-Placement on File was issued, far exceeding the statutory maximum period of 30 days for reviewing whether to place a criminal case on file. The prolonged delay prevented me from timely applying for supervision of the case-filing decision, and artificially blocked lawful channels for defending my rights.

Violation of statutory provision: Article 178 of the Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs.

Disciplinary violation: violation of work discipline, dereliction of duty, and handling the case beyond the prescribed time limit.

3. On December 30, 2024, refusing without legitimate grounds to accept new toxicology evidence

I submitted key evidence of poisoning, including heavy-metal test reports for blood and urine. The police station refused to accept it and did not issue a receipt for the materials, deliberately blocking avenues for a review of the case and abusing its authority to obstruct members of the public from presenting evidence and defending their rights.

Violation of statutory provision: Article 187 of the Provisions on the Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs.

Disciplinary violation: violation of public-contact discipline by deliberately blocking channels for public redress.

II. Weiyang Branch of the Xi’an Public Security Bureau: failure of internal law-enforcement supervision and unlawful prejudgment and interference in the review of the case by personnel

1. Failure to supervise a series of unlawful case-handling actions by Daming Palace Police Station

The branch was aware of multiple irregularities at the grassroots police station, including failure to act after receiving the report, handling the case beyond the prescribed time limit, and refusing to accept evidence. It did not conduct an investigation or make corrections, nor did it provide a substantive response. The internal law-enforcement supervision mechanism had completely failed.

Disciplinary violation: violation of work discipline through ineffective performance of supervisory duties and dereliction of duty and oversight.

2. Secretary Wang of the branch Discipline Inspection Commission made unlawful prejudicial statements, contrary to the principle of rule of law

On September 29, 2025, before fully reviewing the new toxicology evidence, Secretary Wang of the Discipline Inspection Commission explicitly told me: “I participated in your case from beginning to end. Even if there is new evidence, I will not place it on file.” This statement prejudged the validity of the evidence, violated the case-filing review rules under the Criminal Procedure Law, and seriously damaged the credibility of public-security law enforcement.

Violation of statutory provision: Article 112 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China.

Disciplinary violations: violation of work discipline by unlawfully interfering in the review of the case; violation of public-contact discipline by verbally harming a petitioner and damaging relations between the Party and the public and between officials and the public.

III. Wang Yiran of the Shaanxi Provincial Public Security Department (police ID number 000153): serious violations of the petition review procedure, bending the law for personal ends, shielding subordinates, and depriving members of the public of their right to redress

1. The Notice of Conclusion was served seriously late, causing me to lose statutory avenues for redress

On October 30, 2023, the provincial public security department issued a petition-related Notice of Conclusion. The case handler, Wang Yiran, failed to serve the document promptly as required and delayed it without justification for 11 months. I did not obtain the document until September 5, 2024, after repeatedly asking about it.

The delayed service directly caused me to miss the statutory time limits for applying to the procuratorate for supervision of the case-filing decision and for initiating administrative litigation, completely depriving me of statutory avenues for redress and constituting a serious procedural violation.

Violation of regulations: provisions concerning service of documents under the Provisions on Public Security Organs’ Handling of Petition Matters.

Disciplinary violations: violation of public-contact and work discipline, disregard for the personal-harm rights and interests of a member of the public, and serious irresponsibility in performing duties.

2. Shielding unlawful case handling by subordinate public-security personnel, failing to substantively review the entire case, and suppressing the case for personal ends

I submitted to the provincial public security department the complete evidence of unlawful conduct by the police station and the Weiyang branch, as well as medical reports on heavy-metal poisoning. Wang Yiran failed to examine, one by one, the unlawful facts throughout the entire chain at the grassroots level, failed to conduct a substantive review of the toxicology evidence, deliberately covered up irregularities by subordinate case-handling personnel, and hastily issued a concluding document to suppress the case without correction. This involved clear favoritism and partiality and the handling of a case based on relationships.

Disciplinary characterization: violation of the Party’s political, public-contact, work, and integrity disciplines; bending the law for personal ends and suppressing the case without investigation.

Conclusion

From the initial failure of Daming Palace Police Station to act after receiving the report, through the failure of supervision and unlawful interference in the review of the case by the Weiyang branch, to the unlawful service of documents and the conclusion of the petition through bending the law for personal ends by Wang Yiran of the Shaanxi Provincial Public Security Department, public-security personnel at the three levels formed a complete chain of unlawful case handling. All of these actions simultaneously violated the Party’s Six Disciplines and the laws and regulations relating to criminal procedure and public-security law enforcement, completely depriving me of my right to defend my rights in accordance with the law. The personal injury caused by my heavy-metal poisoning has so far been impossible to pursue through judicial channels, resulting in irreversible harm to my rights.

I hereby formally submit these complaint materials to your unit and respectfully request a comprehensive investigation into the disciplinary and unlawful conduct of all personnel involved; that they be held strictly accountable pursuant to the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of the Communist Party of China and relevant public-security law-enforcement provisions; that the improperly issued Notice of Conclusion be revoked; that an out-of-area unit be designated to accept all toxicology testing evidence; that the investigation into the case be restarted; that all procedural violations be corrected; and that legal fairness and justice and the lawful personal rights and interests of citizens be safeguarded.

Respectfully submitted to:

Central Commission for Political and Legal Affairs

Complainant: Shi Xiuju

June 22, 2026