Human Rights Defender Tan Zuolong’s Reflections on the First Anniversary of His Release from Prison—“I Will Continue on the Original Path; You Continue Living”
Editor’s note: Tan Zuolong was sentenced to three and a half years for reporting problems involving public funds and the judiciary, on charges of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble.” After his release, he continued reporting problems and defending rights, while using self-media to continue following and supporting other human rights cases.
More than 2,000 years ago, Socrates was sentenced to death. At parting, he said: “The time has come for us to part; I go to die, and you go to live. Which is better, only God knows.” It was not that he was unafraid of death; he was simply afraid that he had not made himself clear.
Today marks exactly one year since my release from prison.
On this day last year, I walked out of the gate of Wudu Prison.
A prison police officer still tried to pull me toward the prison vehicle and would not let me get into the car sent by my friends to pick me up. I turned around and punched him in the face. Once I had walked out of the prison gate, he no longer had the right to restrict my personal freedom.
This prison guard was both pitiable and hateful. He thought he could do whatever he wanted to prisoners inside the prison, and could also do whatever he wanted outside the prison gate. Although my punch did not hit him in the face, it did give him a little clarity. He had no right to make me get into that vehicle.
After my release, I lost my job and had nowhere to live. Not one person in the circle of former public employees dared to contact me. To survive, I embarked on the arduous road to the imperial capital to make a living. I queued at Yongdingmen, rented a place in Fangshan, and was taken to Jiujingzhuang. The Gansu Office in Beijing also restricted my freedom (does that count as unlawful detention?). Certain judicial personnel also warned friends who contacted me, saying that Tan Zi was constantly monitoring my whereabouts and was ready to arrest me again at any time.
Over this year, I once again saw streets where I was free, people bargaining at vegetable markets, students carrying schoolbags across the road, and ginkgo leaves turning yellow for another season. I saw those most ordinary scenes while dragging my drunken body along with friends from Yunnan, and walked through them together with a friend from Hunan while listening to his difficult-to-understand dialect.
In the first half of my life, I taught at a primary school in Cheng County, wrote documents at the county Party committee’s Policy Research Office, and worked in the Organization Department and the Supervision, Inspection and Assessment Bureau. I served as deputy director of the Talent Office, director of the Grassroots Office, a member of the Organization Department’s Leading Party Members Group, head of the Cadre Division, and deputy director of the Supervision, Inspection and Assessment Bureau. The Organization spent decades cultivating me. What it taught me was not to protect myself by staying out of trouble, but to be loyal to the Party, to dare to take responsibility, and to be accountable for public funds.
Later, because I persisted in reporting the problem of China Property & Casualty Insurance’s alleged fraud involving approximately 800,000 yuan in government funds, I believed that Wang Zhaozhi and Li Haifeng of the Cheng County Procuratorate, and Yang Gengding of the Cheng County Court, had engaged in favoritism and bending the law rather than acting in accordance with the law. I sent letters reporting the matter to relevant authorities, including Cheng County Party Secretary Li Xiang and Wang Wenquan. I was held criminally responsible on charges of picking quarrels and provoking trouble, sentenced to three years and six months in prison, and sent behind the high walls.
I respect legal procedures and also abide by the court’s judgment; but I have never regarded the fact that I “reported problems” as a crime. The law gave me a term of imprisonment, but it also gave me time—time to think through many things.
Over this year, I came to understand that reporting those judicial officials who show favoritism and bend the law is protecting the peace of more people. This is not hatred; it is responsibility.
Over this year, I have thanked many strangers who did not know me at all. They gave me selfless help and helped me get through the most difficult days. I thank the friends who answered my calls late at night. They did not urge me to give up; they only urged me to be careful. I also thank the comrades with whom I once worked. Even though many people no longer contact me, I understand that silence.
Over this year, I learned one thing: emotion can never speak for evidence. There is nothing wrong with crying out that one has been wronged, but reporting requires documentation, and the documentation must stand up to scrutiny. So I do not make a scene, curse, or invent stories. I submit materials according to procedure, write letters, and go from one service window to another. Some submissions are rejected, some disappear without a trace, and some receive only the reply, “Received.” That is all right. I keep the receipt for every submission, because I believe that one day, someone will carefully read everything through.
Socrates drank hemlock. He did not win, but his students passed down his teachings. I am not great, nor do I want to be a martyr. I only want to be a living, clear-minded person who speaks openly in the sunlight.
“I will continue on the original path; you continue living.” These are my own reflections on leaving prison. I do not curse anyone, nor do I expect to overturn a wrongful case overnight. I only know that the past has already been judged, while the future has yet to be decided. I have the judgment in my hands. Everything else I leave to Heaven, and also to the law.
On the first anniversary of my release, I am neither sad nor excited. I will continue walking, continue writing, and continue submitting materials until there is a reply that dares to tell me: The problems you reported have all been thoroughly investigated.
Because I have understood one most simple truth: Some things always require someone to stand up and speak; some peace always requires someone to protect it.
I will also look at Yang Jia’s past, and at the QQ incident. In fact, there are things that everyone can do.
In this world, nothing is a question of whether it is worth it; it is only a question of whether you are willing.

Source
- Outlet
- 维权信息中心报告
- Original report
- https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2026/09/blog-post_22.html
- Original publication
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Sep 22, 2026
Related Reporting
Nov 10, 2026
Lawyer Wen Donghai: One year after the Zion case, eight pastors remain in pretrial detention on suspicion of fraud and illegal business operations
One year after the Zion case, of the nearly 20 pastors who were arrested, some were released on bail and some went abroad. The remaining eight pastors, including Wang Cong, Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia and Yin Huibin, remain in pretrial detention on suspicion of fraud and illegal business operations. Yet the People’s Procuratorate of Yinhai District, Beihai, faced with more than 300 case files and a large number of discs, did not conduct a serious review or hear the views of defense lawyers and defendants, and hastily filed the case with the court within a month. Strangely, once the case reached the court, no trial or pretrial conference was held, and no one raised procedural or evidentiary issues in any formal court proceeding. The procuratorate then acknowledged that the evidence was insufficient and recommended that the court adjourn the trial for supplementary investigation. Since they knew the evidence was insufficient yet still forced through a hasty prosecution, this was a deliberate attempt to frame them and secure convictions. For this reason, on November 9, 2026, the families’ representatives visited the People’s Procuratorate of Yinhai District, the Beihai Municipal People’s Procuratorate and the Beihai Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision regarding the conduct of the case handlers at the Yinhai District Procuratorate.
Nov 10, 2026
71-year-old Falun Gong practitioner Zhang Yuzhen from Dashiqiao City, Liaoning, sentenced to nine years, falls critically ill after being detained and persecuted, and is only then granted “medical parole”
On November 10, 2026, this outlet learned that Zhang Yuzhen, a 71-year-old Falun Gong practitioner from Dashiqiao City, Liaoning, who was sentenced to nine years, became critically ill after being detained and persecuted and was only then granted “medical parole.” Zhang Yuzhen and his wife, Gong Suyan, were arrested and detained in November 2025. In July 2026, they were sentenced to nine years and eight years and six months, respectively. On the evening of October 29, the family suddenly received a notice saying that Zhang Yuzhen was being resuscitated at Luhe Hospital in Dashiqiao City, that the hospital had issued a critical condition notice, and that family members were required to come sign it. According to reports, when Zhang Yuzhen was transferred from the Dashiqiao City Detention Center to Luhe Hospital, he was already unconscious. After emergency treatment at the hospital, his body temperature gradually rose to 35 degrees Celsius, after which he was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). On October 31, he was transferred again to the ICU at Yingkou Central Hospital. After an expert consulta
Nov 10, 2026
Case Details and Profile of Ms. Qian Youyun, Falun Gong Practitioner from Jiangxia District, Wuhan, Sentenced to Four Years
On November 10, 2026, this website learned of the case details and profile of Ms. Qian Youyun, a Falun Gong practitioner from Jiangxia District, Wuhan, who was sentenced to four years. The report is as follows: Qian Youyun: A female Falun Gong practitioner from Jiangxia District, Wuhan, formerly an employee of the Jiangxia District Grain and Feed Company in Wuhan, she began practicing Falun Gong in May 1998. Because she persisted in her Falun Gong beliefs, Qian Youyun has suffered wrongful imprisonment four times: one period of reeducation through labor lasting one and a half years, and three prison sentences totaling nine years. Her family has also been deeply affected. Her husband is in poor health and retired; after his pension was arbitrarily deducted, they struggled financially. For many years, the two worked away from home to make ends meet. On October 31, 2025, Qian Youyun was reported and arrested while talking about Falun Gong at a market. She was then taken to the First Women's Detention Center in Dongxihu District, Wuhan, and detained for 15 days. After that term expired, she was placed under criminal detention and transferred to the Wuhan Women's Detention Center. She was later formally arrested and indicted. After one year.
Nov 10, 2026
Rights Defense Network Policy and Legislation Review: Draft Revision to the Law on the Administration of Tax Collection Open for Public Comment—Major Overhaul of the Tax Collection Law: Paper Rights Cannot Conceal Deep-Seated Fault Lines in Unbalanced Enforcement
Special Commentator: Zhang Haoran. On November 6, 2026, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Administration of Tax Collection (Draft Revision) was released for public comment after its first review at the 25th session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress. The deadline for comments is December 5. The draft has six chapters and 100 articles. While improving tax collection and administration measures, it strengthens protections for taxpayers’ rights and interests, stipulates that enforcement measures against individuals may not involve entering their homes, requires that essential living necessities for their dependents be retained, caps late payment surcharges at twice the amount of tax owed, and strictly protects the confidentiality of tax-related information. The draft also sets out provisions on online platforms’ tax-related assistance obligations and recovery of tax from investors. The public may submit comments online or send them in writing to the Legislative Affairs Commission of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (For details, see: http://www.npc.gov.cn/flcaw/index.html) Review: Tax Collection Law