Agents in the Duan Hua case Wen Donghai and Wang Ligan forcibly summoned by officers from the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau
On July 24, 2026, this outlet learned that Wen Donghai and Wang Ligan, agents in the Duan Hua case, were forcibly summoned by officers from the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau.
On the afternoon of July 22, 2026, prominent legal professionals Wen Donghai and Wang Liqian, acting as entrusted representatives for the family of the “Duan Hua case” in filing complaints, went to the Guilin Municipal Commission of Supervision in Guangxi to legally submit complaint materials concerning suspected disciplinary and legal violations by Huang Wenqing, president of the Lingui District Court, and Nie Huayu, vice president.
According to information previously disclosed by Wen Donghai, on-site staff of the Commission of Supervision refused to accept the materials and were unwilling to process them on the grounds that the matter involved litigation-related legal issues. The two sides engaged in nearly three hours of negotiations and communication on site. During the negotiations, the two sides had a verbal altercation, after which staff of the Commission of Supervision called the police. Subsequently, the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau dispatched several officers, including Su Zihua, to the scene and forcibly summoned Wen Donghai and Wang Liqian to the Lingui Police Station, claiming that they intended to impose public-security penalties on the two. The two were later released.
Wen Donghai issued the following account of the matter: Today, Wang Ligan and I submitted complaint materials to the Guilin Municipal Commission of Supervision, but a member of the Commission’s staff (apparently named Wang Zefu) said that this involved litigation-related legal issues and would not accept or process the materials. He also firmly refused to tell us his name. In order not to accept the materials, he deliberately misread the statutory provision, omitting the words “transfer,” and Wang Ligan asked him to show us the Supervision Law, but he refused to do so. However, according to the Supervision Law and the Regulations on Letters and Visits, even if the matter is not under their jurisdiction, they should first accept the materials and then transfer them to the authority with the power to handle them. Moreover, as Huang Wenqing and Nie Huayu are the president and vice president of the court, their multiple illegal acts are certainly also suspected of disciplinary violations and must fall within the jurisdiction of the Commission for Discipline Inspection.
We argued with him all afternoon, for nearly three hours, but he simply refused to accept the materials. In our anger, I said that with this work style, he would be better off going to eat shit. Wang Ligan said, “If you are a human being, then read Article 30 of the Supervision Law. If you do not dare to read it, then you are an animal.” He reported that we had insulted him, and Su Zihua and several other officers from the Lingui Police Station of the Lingui Branch of the Guilin Public Security Bureau forcibly summoned us to the police station, saying that they would impose public-security penalties on us.
They can wantonly frame lawyer Duan Hua and can turn a blind eye to laws written in black and white, but when it comes to our demands, not a single gesture can be wrong.
Source
- Outlet
- 维权信息中心报告
- Original report
- https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2026/07/blog-post_24.html
- Original publication
- Jul 24, 2026
- Retrieved
- Aug 30, 2026
Related Reporting
Oct 16, 2026
Rights Defense Network: Analysis of New Policies and Regulations: Four Departments Launch Special Campaign to Rectify Improper Marketing and Hype Involving the Military Online — Rectifying Military-Related Marketing: Vague Standards, a Blade Most Likely to Cut the Boundaries of Innocent People’s Speech
Four Chinese government and military bodies announced a two-month campaign to address improper military-related marketing online, including fabricated military identities, misleading policy claims, counterfeit uniforms and disclosure of sensitive information. The article argues that vague standards could sweep up ordinary veterans and military families, restricting lawful expression and livelihoods. It calls for clear, predictable rules that target proven violations and says support for veterans’ rights and benefits is essential to protecting their standing.
Oct 16, 2026
Civil Rights and Livelihood Watch: Policy and Regulations Review: State Council Approves the National Action Plan for Disability Prevention (2026–2030) — Disability Prevention Action Plan: Livelihoods on Paper Do Not Constitute Genuine Human Rights Protection
China’s State Council approved the National Action Plan for Disability Prevention (2026–2030) in principle on October 3, 2026, and published it on October 8. Its six initiatives address public education, birth defects, disease, injuries, rehabilitation and prevention capacity. The plan aims to improve China’s prevention policies and network by 2030. The accompanying commentary questions whether agencies can overcome divided responsibilities and implementation gaps, particularly in preventing environmental risks and protecting health rights.
Oct 15, 2026
Jiangsu Provincial People's Government Deprives Human Rights Defender Shen Aibin of His Right to Administrative Reconsideration and Right to Remedy Through a “Notice”
A Rights Defense Network Information Center report says Jiangsu’s provincial government notified human rights defender Shen Aibin on October 10, 2026, that his administrative reconsideration application was outside the scope of the Administrative Reconsideration Law because his government-information request concerned petition-related activity. Shen had sought information about the government’s handling of his complaint alleging abuse at Liyang Prison. He says the notice denies him review and a remedy, and plans to bring legal action.
Oct 15, 2026
Beijing’s Fengtai District Government Upholds Decision in Review Case Filed by Wuxi Xishan Petitioner Yin Baimei Over Fengtai Police’s Refusal to Open a Case
Beijing’s Fengtai District Government upheld a police decision not to open an administrative case after Wuxi petitioner Yin Baimei reported being detained and assaulted in Beijing on June 28, 2026. The Fengtai Public Security Sub-Bureau said its decision relied on a statement from Yangjian Police Station that officials had received Yin and persuaded her to return, without beating or injuring her. Yin disputes that account and says she will sue over the reconsideration decision.




