Li Qiaochu: I am waiting at the entrance to the police affairs service station of Lunan Prison!
Today is August 25, 2026, family homecoming day. My second older sister has already obtained a queue number. I am currently outside Lunan Prison. At 8:50 a.m., I called the prison to request an in-person discussion with the prison warden regarding the special visitation application concerning marriage registration that I submitted four months ago. The telephone operator said that the matter had already been reported to the leadership and asked me to wait at the entrance for a response.
On April 12, I mailed the visitation application to the prison. After the prison received it, there has been no further response. More than four months have passed as of today. On August 18, I sent another letter urging them to process it. According to documents issued by the Ministry of Justice, the visitation application I submitted requires the prison warden’s approval. I do not know whether the prison’s administration department has forwarded the application to the warden, whether the warden is aware of it, or what stage the approval process has reached.
Over the past few months, I have been busy with the follow-up procedures for the marriage application. At the same time, because of what happened with his mother, Zhi Yong has remained very low-spirited, worried and anxious. Since early June, the review of our correspondence has always taken a very long time. The difficulty of communicating often makes me feel that no matter how hard I try, it is never enough to comfort him.
In late July, I reported Zhi Yong’s exercise-time issue to the prison in accordance with the law. To this day, I have not received confirmation from him as to whether the situation has improved. The two letters I mailed in late July—in which I specifically asked whether his right to exercise had received basic protection—have still not reached him.
Such meetings have precedents both in law and in the practice of prison administration, and they also protect the lawful rights and interests of incarcerated people. I hope to communicate with the prison warden in person, or at the very least have a channel through which to raise the matter.
I am waiting at the entrance.
Li Qiaochu
August 25, 2026

Related Reporting
Aug 30, 2026
China Rights Defense Network: Monthly Report on Political Prisoners and Prisoners of Conscience in Mainland China (August 31, 2026), Issue 131 (1,638 people in total)
The Rights Defense Network Information Center released its 131st monthly report on August 31, 2026, stating that 40 people on the previous roster had completed their sentences and been released, 30 had new developments while in prison, six had been newly criminally detained or forcibly disappeared, 28 had been newly sentenced, and one had died in prison; the report lists a total of 1,638 political prisoners and prisoners of conscience in custody.
Aug 30, 2026
Case Details and Biography of Sun Chao, Christian Church Preacher in Qujing, Yunnan, Criminally Detained
Sun Chao, a Christian preacher at Philadelphia Church in Qujing, Yunnan, was transferred to criminal detention on August 7, 2026, after completing a 12-day administrative detention for preaching the Gospel. Authorities reportedly cited suspected “illegal organization of gatherings.” Sun, who has epilepsy and requires regular medication, is detained at Xuanwei City Detention Center. His wife, Zhao Ying, has appealed for attention to his health and rights.
Aug 29, 2026
Li Qiaochu: Update on Xu Zhiyong’s Situation in Prison (August 29, 2026)
The writer received a letter from Xu Zhiyong dated August 21, 2026, saying his outdoor time had improved to 10 a.m. daily for 30 minutes. Correspondence had also become smoother than during the previous two months. The writer considers the matter closed for now but plans to continue asking about Xu’s basic living conditions. Xu reportedly liked hand-drawn pictures sent with a letter in late July.
Aug 29, 2026
Chow Hang-tung: Statement of Plea
The author rejects a 206-page judgment that, they argue, treats belief in ending one-party dictatorship as unconstitutional and criminal. They say law cannot control thoughts, condemn obedience to authoritarian power, and describe ending one-party dictatorship as a responsibility of Hong Kong and Chinese people. The author refuses to apologize for these beliefs, accepts possible imprisonment, and vows to continue pursuing democracy, accountability for the 1989 massacre and a democratic Hong Kong and China.