Hong Kong prominent democracy activist Joshua Wong charged under the Hong Kong National Security Law with “conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or external forces to endanger national security”; trial opens today
(Rights Defense Network Information Center report) On September 2, 2026, this outlet learned that today Joshua Wong pleaded guilty in a Hong Kong court to one charge under the National Security Law of “conspiracy to collude with foreign forces to endanger national security”; the court will defer sentencing to another day.
Wong was previously sentenced to 4 years and 8 months in prison in Hong Kong’s “47-person case.” Including other cases, he has been detained for more than 2,100 days to date. After pleading guilty today to the latest national security case brought by prosecutors, Wong faces the prospect of a heavy sentence.
Joshua Wong biography: Born on October 13, 1996; English name Joshua Wong Chi-fung; Christian; nationality Chinese (Hong Kong), British national; nonpartisan pro-democracy figure; named one of the 25 most influential teenagers of 2014 by the US magazine Time; leader of the “Umbrella Movement”; convener of Hong Kong’s student movement thought; secretary-general of Demosisto; political prisoner detained in China.
From childhood, he participated in church activities with his parents, worked as a volunteer and enthusiastically served community public affairs; in 2014, he studied at Hong Kong Metropolitan University and graduated from the university with outstanding results in October 2020; on May 29, 2011, he and his secondary-school alumnus Ivan Lam Long-yin founded the student organization Scholarism. They organized student marches, rallies and other events many times to oppose the Hong Kong government’s brainwashing education aimed at making students support the Chinese Communist Party under the guise of moral and national education, thereby attracting widespread attention from all sectors of society;
On July 15, 2012, he was invited to appear on City Forum, where he debated the national education issue with other guests. Because of his outstanding performance, he won widespread public praise and became the spark that triggered the full-scale outbreak across Hong Kong of the movement against “brainwashing education”;
On September 26, 2014, he was arrested by police for participating in the Umbrella Movement and leading students in a “peaceful Occupy Central” class boycott rally, and was later released on bail;
On April 10, 2016, after founding Demosisto with Ivan Lam and others, advocating Hong Kong self-governance while not supporting Hong Kong independence, and stating at the same time that “if there is no democratic self-governance, there is only Hong Kong independence,” he became “someone who does not fit Beijing’s wishes”;
On August 17, 2017, he was arrested again over the incident involving the retaking of Civic Square and was sentenced to six months in prison by the Hong Kong High Court for “unlawful assembly”;
On January 17, 2018, the court also sentenced him to an additional three months for “criminal contempt of court”;
He appealed the sentence, which was reduced to two months on May 16, 2019; after being released from prison, he joined the “anti-extradition” movement again, demanding that the government explicitly withdraw the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance amendment bill and retract its erroneous designation of the million-person march on June 9 as a riot. He also stated that Carrie Lam was no longer qualified to remain chief executive because she had caused Hong Kong people to bleed, thereby making the Hong Kong government and the Chinese Communist Party authorities even more uneasy;
On August 13, 2019, as a large-scale gathering and protest was about to break out at Hong Kong International Airport, he livestreamed on Facebook, calling for the number of participants in the march to exceed one million, among other things. He was subsequently taken away by police on the streets on August 30 and charged by prosecutors with offenses including “inciting others to participate in an unauthorized assembly”;
On September 8, 2019, he was detained by police on the grounds of “breaching bail conditions” while preparing to travel to Germany to discuss the situation in Hong Kong; on October 29 of the same year, after registering to stand in the district council elections, he was deprived of the right to stand for election by Beijing’s “hard order”;
On June 30, 2020, after China’s National People’s Congress passed the “Hong Kong version of the National Security Law,” he was forced to announce his resignation as secretary-general of Demosisto and withdraw from Demosisto, stating that he would put his beliefs into practice in his personal capacity in the future; in June 2019, in connection with the case involving the surrounding of the Hong Kong Police Headquarters, he was detained again by police together with Agnes Chow and Ivan Lam. Although he was temporarily granted bail during that period, he was later remanded in custody and arrested again;
On November 23, 2020, the case involving the three of them opened at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts, where they faced three charges: “inciting others to participate in an unauthorized assembly,” “organizing an unauthorized assembly” and “knowingly participating in an unauthorized assembly.” They were sentenced separately on December 2 of the same year, with Wong receiving a sentence of 13 and a half months; he had earlier been sentenced to four months for the unauthorized assembly case in Causeway Bay on October 5. In 2021, he was sentenced again by the Hong Kong District Court to 10 months for the “unauthorized assembly” case involving the June 4 candlelight vigil; following an appeal, this was reduced to eight months, with the terms of the two sentences served separately.
In March 2022, he completed his prison sentence, but was again charged over his previous participation in the 2020 Legislative Council primary, with his conduct alleged to have violated the Hong Kong National Security Law’s offense of “subversion of state power.” He therefore remained in Stanley Prison awaiting further trial; on April 17, 2023, after being accused of “disclosing police officers’ personal information,” he was sentenced to three months by the Hong Kong High Court for “contempt of court”;
On November 19, 2024, the 47-person subversion case was sentenced collectively at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts, and he was sentenced to four years and eight months in prison for “conspiracy to subvert state power.” He is currently serving his sentence at Stanley Prison in Hong Kong.
This outlet will continue to follow Joshua Wong’s situation.
Source
- Outlet
- 维权信息中心报告
- Original report
- https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2026/09/blog-post_630.html
- Original publication
- Sep 2, 2026
- Retrieved
- Sep 2, 2026
Related Reporting
Oct 16, 2026
Dissident writer Yu Xiaoming of Ningbo, Zhejiang, has been labeled mentally ill for 12 years; loses first and second appeals in lawsuit against Ningbo Zhenhai District Health Commission
On October 17, 2026, this outlet learned that dissident writer Yu Xiaoming of Ningbo, Zhejiang, has been labeled mentally ill for 12 years and lost both the first and second trials in his lawsuit against the Ningbo Zhenhai District Health Commission. Yu Xiaoming: Born in 1985, male, resident of Zhenhai District, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province. Since 2014, the local government in Ningbo has, without Yu Xiaoming’s informed consent, labeled him with six mental illness diagnoses (Yu Xiaoming has no history of psychiatric hospitalization or diagnosis) and reported him to the schizophrenia list under the “686” National Mental Health Program,” dealing a devastating blow to his life. His parents blame him, it is difficult to find work, and he often faces disdain from others. To date, Yu Xiaoming has been labeled mentally ill for 12 years. To get rid of the mental illness label and avoid being confined to a psychiatric hospital, he has appealed multiple times. He lost at trial in June this year and lost again on appeal in September. He has faced a powerful state apparatus alone for more than a decade, and now must continue his lonely journey. Everything behind his being labeled mentally ill
Oct 16, 2026
Li Qiaochu: The 487th day since Xu Zhiyong and I applied to marry without success — a report on the situation
October 16, 2026 An update on developments. The government information disclosure request I submitted on September 6, 2026—seeking disclosure of information about the four staff members on August 25, as well as the preservation status of the audio and video from the on-site law enforcement body cameras—is directly related to my procedural right to require the prison to issue a written denial so that I can exercise my right to seek redress. The statutory deadline for responding to this information disclosure request expires on October 12, 2028. The prison has neither responded nor notified me of an extension; this is a complete failure to respond. I have therefore filed for administrative reconsideration, requesting confirmation that its failure to respond was unlawful and an order requiring it to respond. The reconsideration authority acknowledged receipt of the application on October 15. There is one more matter. At the end of July 2026, I submitted an information disclosure request to the prison concerning regulations on outdoor time. Although I did not receive a written response from the prison at the end of August, I received a letter from Xu Zhiyong confirming that outdoor time had improved, so I did not want to pursue the matter further.
Oct 16, 2026
Xu Weiping, a rights defender from Changzhou, Jiangsu, goes missing after being abducted by Changzhou police in Nanjing
On October 16, 2026, this publication learned that on the morning of October 15, 2026, Xu Weiping, a rights defender from the Economic Development Zone of Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, posted several videos at a Route 56 bus stop beside Nanjing Railway Station. In the videos, Xu described how the Changzhou government had illegally and violently demolished her lawful home 19 years ago and had failed to provide resettlement and compensation in accordance with the law. She also saw police cars and officers from the Changzhou police, her local police force, present and stopping her. Xu questioned the Changzhou police’s conduct in coming to Nanjing to intercept her petition. It is understood that Xu went to Nanjing this time to report to the Jiangsu Provincial Bureau for Letters and Calls, the provincial public security department, and other agencies that the local Changzhou government had illegally demolished her lawful home 19 years ago and had yet to resolve the matter; that she had pursued her rights in accordance with the law, but instead of resolving the problem, the government was dealing with the person who raised it; and that it had directed the police and petition authorities to repeatedly crack down on, suppress, and unlawfully intercept her lawful rights-defense efforts, among other issues. At the 56 bus stop in Nanjing,
Oct 16, 2026
Rights Defense Network Policy and Regulations Commentary: Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Publishes the Draft Measures for Protecting the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment for Public Comment — New Forms of Employment Protection Order: The Officials’ Fire Still Burns, While the People’s Lamps Are Blown Out
Special Commentator: Zhang Haoran. On October 8, 2026, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with several other departments, issued the Draft Measures for Protecting the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment for public comment. The deadline for comments is November 8, 2026. The draft measures mainly apply to platform workers in new forms of employment, such as food delivery riders, ride-hailing drivers, and freight workers. The document sets out classifications for various employment arrangements and prohibits platforms from evading employment responsibilities by inducing workers to register as individual businesses, subcontracting through multiple tiers, or using other methods. It covers specific matters including the settlement of labor remuneration, platform algorithm management, working hours and rest arrangements, reasonable remuneration for holidays, and restrictions on fines. It also clarifies procedures for handling labor disputes and the corresponding legal responsibilities of relevant parties. Members of the public may submit proposed revisions through various channels, including website comments, postal mail, and email. (For details, see
