Dissident writer Yu Xiaoming of Ningbo, Zhejiang, has been labeled mentally ill for 12 years; loses first and second appeals in lawsuit against Ningbo Zhenhai District Health Commission
On October 17, 2026, this outlet learned that dissident writer Yu Xiaoming of Ningbo, Zhejiang, has been labeled mentally ill for 12 years and lost both the first and second trials in his lawsuit against the Ningbo Zhenhai District Health Commission
Yu Xiaoming: Born in 1985, male, resident of Zhenhai District, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province. Since 2014, the local government in Ningbo has, without Yu Xiaoming’s informed consent, labeled him with six mental illness diagnoses (Yu Xiaoming has no history of psychiatric hospitalization or diagnosis) and reported him to the schizophrenia list under the “686” National Mental Health Program,” dealing a devastating blow to his life. His parents blame him, it is difficult to find work, and he often faces disdain from others.
To date, Yu Xiaoming has been labeled mentally ill for 12 years. To get rid of the mental illness label and avoid being confined to a psychiatric hospital, he has appealed multiple times. He lost at trial in June this year and lost again on appeal in September. He has faced a powerful state apparatus alone for more than a decade, and now must continue his lonely journey.
Everything behind his being labeled mentally ill stems from Yu Xiaoming’s love of writing. He began publishing dissenting views in 2011, protesting local government policies and calling for reform. His proposals were merely moderate calls for improvement, yet they brought day-after-day and year-after-year retaliation from the local government. He was taken to a police station twice and tortured, placed under house arrest by the subdistrict and community authorities multiple times, labeled mentally ill, and repeatedly threatened with confinement in a psychiatric hospital.
Later, even when surrounded by enemies on all sides, Yu Xiaoming continued to study law on his own, hoping to seek justice for himself and everyone labeled mentally ill, demand state compensation, and advance the rule of law in China. Unfortunately, every appeal ended in defeat, and the case was overlooked by the outside world for many years. It finally entered the public eye in 2025.
However, the authorities escalated their actions, sending people to threaten him at his home and initiating procedures to send him to a psychiatric hospital. He had no choice but to appeal again, and the outcome was predictable. Without any warning, the Literature City website immediately shut down the account he had maintained for years. The writing Yu Xiaoming had poured his heart and soul into for more than a decade vanished in an instant. Fortunately, he had saved a few copies in advance and stored them on other websites.
Yu Xiaoming’s friends are very worried that he may be forced to spend the rest of his life in a psychiatric hospital. Though he had no mental illness, he has been persecuted into mental illness. Such tragedies should be prevented from happening again.
This outlet will continue to follow Yu Xiaoming’s situation.
Source
- Outlet
- 维权信息中心报告
- Original report
- https://wqw2010.blogspot.com/2026/10/blog-post_17.html
- Original publication
- Oct 16, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 16, 2026
Related Reporting
Oct 16, 2026
Li Qiaochu: The 487th day since Xu Zhiyong and I applied to marry without success — a report on the situation
October 16, 2026 An update on developments. The government information disclosure request I submitted on September 6, 2026—seeking disclosure of information about the four staff members on August 25, as well as the preservation status of the audio and video from the on-site law enforcement body cameras—is directly related to my procedural right to require the prison to issue a written denial so that I can exercise my right to seek redress. The statutory deadline for responding to this information disclosure request expires on October 12, 2028. The prison has neither responded nor notified me of an extension; this is a complete failure to respond. I have therefore filed for administrative reconsideration, requesting confirmation that its failure to respond was unlawful and an order requiring it to respond. The reconsideration authority acknowledged receipt of the application on October 15. There is one more matter. At the end of July 2026, I submitted an information disclosure request to the prison concerning regulations on outdoor time. Although I did not receive a written response from the prison at the end of August, I received a letter from Xu Zhiyong confirming that outdoor time had improved, so I did not want to pursue the matter further.
Oct 16, 2026
Xu Weiping, a rights defender from Changzhou, Jiangsu, goes missing after being abducted by Changzhou police in Nanjing
On October 16, 2026, this publication learned that on the morning of October 15, 2026, Xu Weiping, a rights defender from the Economic Development Zone of Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, posted several videos at a Route 56 bus stop beside Nanjing Railway Station. In the videos, Xu described how the Changzhou government had illegally and violently demolished her lawful home 19 years ago and had failed to provide resettlement and compensation in accordance with the law. She also saw police cars and officers from the Changzhou police, her local police force, present and stopping her. Xu questioned the Changzhou police’s conduct in coming to Nanjing to intercept her petition. It is understood that Xu went to Nanjing this time to report to the Jiangsu Provincial Bureau for Letters and Calls, the provincial public security department, and other agencies that the local Changzhou government had illegally demolished her lawful home 19 years ago and had yet to resolve the matter; that she had pursued her rights in accordance with the law, but instead of resolving the problem, the government was dealing with the person who raised it; and that it had directed the police and petition authorities to repeatedly crack down on, suppress, and unlawfully intercept her lawful rights-defense efforts, among other issues. At the 56 bus stop in Nanjing,
Oct 16, 2026
Rights Defense Network Policy and Regulations Commentary: Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Publishes the Draft Measures for Protecting the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment for Public Comment — New Forms of Employment Protection Order: The Officials’ Fire Still Burns, While the People’s Lamps Are Blown Out
Special Commentator: Zhang Haoran. On October 8, 2026, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with several other departments, issued the Draft Measures for Protecting the Rights and Interests of Workers in New Forms of Employment for public comment. The deadline for comments is November 8, 2026. The draft measures mainly apply to platform workers in new forms of employment, such as food delivery riders, ride-hailing drivers, and freight workers. The document sets out classifications for various employment arrangements and prohibits platforms from evading employment responsibilities by inducing workers to register as individual businesses, subcontracting through multiple tiers, or using other methods. It covers specific matters including the settlement of labor remuneration, platform algorithm management, working hours and rest arrangements, reasonable remuneration for holidays, and restrictions on fines. It also clarifies procedures for handling labor disputes and the corresponding legal responsibilities of relevant parties. Members of the public may submit proposed revisions through various channels, including website comments, postal mail, and email. (For details, see
Oct 16, 2026
Rights Defense Network: Analysis of New Policies and Regulations: Four Departments Launch Special Campaign to Rectify Improper Marketing and Hype Involving the Military Online — Rectifying Military-Related Marketing: Vague Standards, a Blade Most Likely to Cut the Boundaries of Innocent People’s Speech
Four Chinese government and military bodies announced a two-month campaign to address improper military-related marketing online, including fabricated military identities, misleading policy claims, counterfeit uniforms and disclosure of sensitive information. The article argues that vague standards could sweep up ordinary veterans and military families, restricting lawful expression and livelihoods. It calls for clear, predictable rules that target proven violations and says support for veterans’ rights and benefits is essential to protecting their standing.