Li Qiaochu: Submitting Petition Materials to the Supreme Court for the Third Time
On August 18, 2026, Lawyer Li and I went to the Supreme People's Court for the third time to submit petition materials.
After filling out the “Registration Form for Personnel Making Repeat Visits” on the first floor, we went up to Interview Room 204 on the second floor. Unlike the male judge in Room 206 whom we met the previous two times, Room 204 was occupied by a female judge. As this was her first time handling my case, Lawyer Li briefly stated the grounds for the petition and the main procedural violations. She listened very attentively and rarely interrupted.
We communicated for nearly forty minutes. This time, the criminal petition and newly prepared supplementary materials that we brought were still not accepted on the spot—this was the third time, and my criminal petition has still not been formally docketed.
There were many people in the lobby waiting in line to submit petition materials, and it was not unusual to see people who had come more than ten times. Given the current pace, I do not know how long my case will remain in the queue. I hope the Supreme Court can speed up the review process, initiate proceedings in accordance with the law, and retrieve the case files as soon as possible.
Upon leaving the Supreme Court, I had a feeling all along that “Heaven rewards diligence”—I need to keep going, accumulating visits once every three months; one day, it will finally be my turn for my petition case to be handled.
I often see people online sharing their experiences of persisting with petitions for ten or twenty years. Everyone’s perseverance is filled with hardship and loneliness—as they alternate between confronting the truth of what they experienced and resting, they set out again.
I suppose I am much luckier, having always been accompanied and cared for. And I also know that every effort is made to keep myself from falling out of this world. This is the way my body and mind survive without dissipating in a world that does not name me, acknowledge me, or record me.

Related Reporting
Aug 30, 2026
China Rights Defense Network: Monthly Report on Political Prisoners and Prisoners of Conscience in Mainland China (August 31, 2026), Issue 131 (1,638 people in total)
The Rights Defense Network Information Center released its 131st monthly report on August 31, 2026, stating that 40 people on the previous roster had completed their sentences and been released, 30 had new developments while in prison, six had been newly criminally detained or forcibly disappeared, 28 had been newly sentenced, and one had died in prison; the report lists a total of 1,638 political prisoners and prisoners of conscience in custody.
Aug 30, 2026
Case Details and Biography of Sun Chao, Christian Church Preacher in Qujing, Yunnan, Criminally Detained
Sun Chao, a Christian preacher at Philadelphia Church in Qujing, Yunnan, was transferred to criminal detention on August 7, 2026, after completing a 12-day administrative detention for preaching the Gospel. Authorities reportedly cited suspected “illegal organization of gatherings.” Sun, who has epilepsy and requires regular medication, is detained at Xuanwei City Detention Center. His wife, Zhao Ying, has appealed for attention to his health and rights.
Aug 29, 2026
Li Qiaochu: Update on Xu Zhiyong’s Situation in Prison (August 29, 2026)
The writer received a letter from Xu Zhiyong dated August 21, 2026, saying his outdoor time had improved to 10 a.m. daily for 30 minutes. Correspondence had also become smoother than during the previous two months. The writer considers the matter closed for now but plans to continue asking about Xu’s basic living conditions. Xu reportedly liked hand-drawn pictures sent with a letter in late July.
Aug 29, 2026
Chow Hang-tung: Statement of Plea
The author rejects a 206-page judgment that, they argue, treats belief in ending one-party dictatorship as unconstitutional and criminal. They say law cannot control thoughts, condemn obedience to authoritarian power, and describe ending one-party dictatorship as a responsibility of Hong Kong and Chinese people. The author refuses to apologize for these beliefs, accepts possible imprisonment, and vows to continue pursuing democracy, accountability for the 1989 massacre and a democratic Hong Kong and China.