China’s Local Finances in Difficulty; Henan Police’s Extortionate Conduct Is Particularly Shameless
On August 15, 2026, this outlet learned that Ren Peiyu, a resident of Shierlipu Village, Yulong Town, Xingyang City, Henan Province, publicly reported on July 29, 2026, through the 12389 and 12388 discipline-inspection reporting hotlines, that Zhang Yongchuang, director of the Yulong Town Police Station in Xingyang City, had extorted 2,000 yuan from him, and publicly posted a screenshot showing the amount transferred.
Six days later, Director Zhang Yongchuang instructed nine police officers to travel to Hebei to make an interprovincial arrest. They beat and abducted Ren Peiyu, who was in Chengde, Hebei, seeking payment for a construction project. They showed no identification or legal grounds during the incident. The arrest operation originated from Director Zhang Yongchuang’s belief that Ren Peiyu had gone beyond the scope of surveillance and intended to travel to Beijing to petition at a higher level and accuse him of unlawful extortion; he therefore used public power to arrest Ren across provincial borders.
On December 8, 2024, Ren Peiyu, whose own rights and interests had been infringed, reported the matter to the Yulong Town Police Station and sought help. After receiving the report, Zhang Yongchuang, as station director, not only failed to assist Ren Peiyu, who had reported the matter and sought help, but instead instructed the on-duty officers to beat and injure him, illegally use handcuffs as restraints, restrict his personal freedom, and detain him at the police station. Station Director Zhang Yongchuang personally intervened and demanded that Ren Peiyu, whose personal freedom had been restricted, transfer 2,000 yuan to his private account before allowing him to leave the police station. During this period, no decision on punishment or any official receipt for a fine or confiscated funds was issued.
On August 12, 2026, under pressure from Ren Peiyu’s uninterrupted public online reports, Director Zhang Yongchuang asked the whistleblower to settle the matter privately through a third-party intermediary, saying that he was willing to return the 2,000 yuan he had extorted through illegal means.
Related Reporting
Aug 30, 2026
China Rights Defense Network: Monthly Report on Political Prisoners and Prisoners of Conscience in Mainland China (August 31, 2026), Issue 131 (1,638 people in total)
The Rights Defense Network Information Center released its 131st monthly report on August 31, 2026, stating that 40 people on the previous roster had completed their sentences and been released, 30 had new developments while in prison, six had been newly criminally detained or forcibly disappeared, 28 had been newly sentenced, and one had died in prison; the report lists a total of 1,638 political prisoners and prisoners of conscience in custody.
Aug 30, 2026
Case Details and Biography of Sun Chao, Christian Church Preacher in Qujing, Yunnan, Criminally Detained
Sun Chao, a Christian preacher at Philadelphia Church in Qujing, Yunnan, was transferred to criminal detention on August 7, 2026, after completing a 12-day administrative detention for preaching the Gospel. Authorities reportedly cited suspected “illegal organization of gatherings.” Sun, who has epilepsy and requires regular medication, is detained at Xuanwei City Detention Center. His wife, Zhao Ying, has appealed for attention to his health and rights.
Aug 29, 2026
Li Qiaochu: Update on Xu Zhiyong’s Situation in Prison (August 29, 2026)
The writer received a letter from Xu Zhiyong dated August 21, 2026, saying his outdoor time had improved to 10 a.m. daily for 30 minutes. Correspondence had also become smoother than during the previous two months. The writer considers the matter closed for now but plans to continue asking about Xu’s basic living conditions. Xu reportedly liked hand-drawn pictures sent with a letter in late July.
Aug 29, 2026
Chow Hang-tung: Statement of Plea
The author rejects a 206-page judgment that, they argue, treats belief in ending one-party dictatorship as unconstitutional and criminal. They say law cannot control thoughts, condemn obedience to authoritarian power, and describe ending one-party dictatorship as a responsibility of Hong Kong and Chinese people. The author refuses to apologize for these beliefs, accepts possible imprisonment, and vows to continue pursuing democracy, accountability for the 1989 massacre and a democratic Hong Kong and China.